Hantavirus Outbreaks: History & Current Surveillance

From the Korean War to a 2026 Antarctic cruise ship, hantavirus has repeatedly demonstrated its capacity to cause severe, fast-moving illness in unexpected settings. Here is the full outbreak timeline and current U.S. case data.

Last reviewed: September 15, 2026  |  Sources: CDC (NNDSS and case registry), WHO, PAHO, ECDC

Current Hantavirus Situation (2025–2026)

Hantavirus remains an active, ongoing threat in the Americas. The figures below are the ones the agencies actually publish — with each figure's own date — rather than rounded estimates. Three separate CDC data streams say slightly different things about the United States, and the differences are explained rather than averaged away.

The Americas in 2025: PAHO's Country-by-Country Count

The Pan American Health Organization issued an Epidemiological Alert on 19 December 2025 because 2025 case counts and case-fatality rates rose in several Southern Cone countries. Through epidemiological week 47 of 2025, PAHO's table reads as follows (the "recent average" column is PAHO's own comparison, the mean of the previous four years unless stated).

Source: PAHO/WHO, Epidemiological Alert: Hantavirus Pulmonary Syndrome in the Americas Region, 19 December 2025, through epidemiological week (EW) 47 unless noted. Confirmed HPS cases only. PAHO's U.S. line is provisional and much lower than CDC's own NNDSS count for 2025 (see the next table).
Country (2025)CasesDeathsCFRPAHO's recent-average CFR
Argentina662132%15.4% (above average)
Bolivia (to EW 46)481122.9%15.9%; cases double the 2023–24 average of 23
Chile (to EW 45)35720%23.4% (five-year; below average)
Paraguay27622.2%12.3%; 15 cases in one road-works outbreak (Mariscal Estigarribia)
Brazil201155%30.2% (above average)
Panama1800%
Uruguay (to EW 46)8112.5%13.7%
United States (PAHO's provisional line)7229%PAHO gives 2024 as 20 cases / 8 deaths (40%)
Region total2295925.7%Eight countries reporting

Two things in that table are easy to miss. First, Argentina's 2025 fatality rate (32%) is roughly double its own four-year average, and Brazil's (55%) is nearly double as well; PAHO does not explain why, and neither will we. Second, PAHO's U.S. figure is not the number CDC's surveillance system shows for the same year — see below.

Correction, published September 15, 2026. Until this update the table above showed approximate ranges for each country (for example "about 100 to 150" cases for Argentina) with no source. Those were estimates, not reported counts. They have been replaced with PAHO's published 2025 figures. Logged on our corrections page.

The United States, 2022–2026: What NNDSS Shows That CDC's Consumer Page Doesn't

CDC's public "Reported Cases of Hantavirus Disease" page (dated April 23, 2026) stops at the end of 2023. CDC's weekly National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System (NNDSS) tables, published on data.cdc.gov, do not stop. We read the weekly file directly (rows updated September 9, 2026). It carries two hantavirus lines — "Hantavirus pulmonary syndrome" and "Hantavirus infection, non-hantavirus pulmonary syndrome" — and every count in it is provisional.

Source: CDC NNDSS Weekly Data (data.cdc.gov dataset x9gk-5huc), national "Total" row for the label "Hantavirus pulmonary syndrome", read September 15, 2026. "As first published" is the cumulative count in the final table of that year; "as revised a year later" is the same year's count as shown in the following year's previous-year column. MMWR week 35 of 2026 ended September 5, 2026. Our extraction of CDC's file.
YearHPS cases, as first published at year endSame year, as revised a year laterNote
2022411CDC's finalized case file records 13 for 2022
20231926CDC's finalized case file records 26
20242026PAHO's alert used the year-end figure of 20
20253838 (through week 35 of 2026)Equals 2016's 38, the highest annual count since 2006 (41); PAHO's alert shows 7
2026 (through week 35, ending Sep 5)10Same period of 2025: 38. A quiet year so far

The pattern to take from this: the number CDC publishes in January is not the number it ends up with. Year-end provisional counts for 2022, 2023 and 2024 were each revised upward by roughly a third or more as late reports and reclassifications arrived. A 2025 count of 38 is therefore best read as "at least 38" — and 2026's ten cases through early September will almost certainly grow. This is also why PAHO's U.S. line (7 cases through week 47 of 2025) and CDC's own table (35 by the same week) disagree so sharply: PAHO says its U.S. figure came through a different, provisional reporting route, and that "there is no data available from 2021 to 2023" in its feed. When two official sources conflict, we show both and say which is the surveillance system of record — NNDSS.

State by state, 2025's 38 provisional HPS cases were: New Mexico 7, Arizona 6, California 6, Nevada 5, Colorado 4, Oregon 3, Idaho 2, and one each in Maine, Illinois, West Virginia, Kentucky and Washington — 24 of the 38 in CDC's Mountain census division. The ten 2026 cases through week 35 were Colorado 3, New Mexico 2, and one each in Idaho, Nevada, Washington, New York and Iowa. The separate "non-pulmonary" line — hantavirus infection with fever but no lung involvement, reportable only since 2015 — shows 2 cases in 2025 and 5 so far in 2026.

U.S. Cases by State, 1993–2023: CDC's Finalized Registry

CDC's consumer page gives a cumulative 890 laboratory-confirmed cases of hantavirus disease from surveillance's start in 1993 through the end of 2023 — 859 hantavirus pulmonary syndrome and 31 non-pulmonary infections — and says 94% occurred west of the Mississippi. The state map on that page is drawn from a patient-level file (one row per case: onset month, state, outcome) that CDC serves publicly. We tabulated it. Because it records outcomes, it also yields a state-level case-fatality figure that CDC's page does not state anywhere.

Source: CDC hantavirus case-view data file (gis.cdc.gov, feeding the map on CDC's "Reported Cases of Hantavirus Disease" page dated April 23, 2026): 890 records, 1993–2023 plus 31 retrospectively identified pre-1993 cases and 2 with unknown onset. Counts and case-fatality rates are our tabulation of CDC's file; states with fewer than 10 cases are grouped. Includes the 31 non-pulmonary infections.
StateCasesDeathsCFR
New Mexico1295441.9%
Colorado1214537.2%
Arizona923234.8%
California792430.4%
Washington612032.8%
Texas491428.6%
Utah482041.7%
Montana461123.9%
Nevada391538.5%
Oregon27518.5%
Idaho25520.0%
South Dakota21628.6%
North Dakota20945.0%
Kansas20735.0%
Wyoming19842.1%
Iowa12433.3%
25 other states (1–9 cases each)823036.6%
All 41 jurisdictions with cases (40 states + DC)89030934.7%

Our calculation: 309 deaths ÷ 890 cases = 34.7%, which CDC's page rounds to "35%". Five records carry an unknown outcome; excluding them gives 309 ÷ 885 = 34.9%. The 31 pre-1993 cases were identified retrospectively from stored samples and were 61% fatal (19 of 31) — a reminder that looking backwards finds the deaths first. Among cases with onset from 1993 onward the figure is 289 ÷ 857 = 33.7%. The often-quoted 38% is a different CDC statistic: the share who die among those who go on to develop respiratory symptoms.

Correction, published September 15, 2026. The previous version of this table gave rounded state totals (for example Colorado "about 100", and a single "about 50" line for the entire eastern United States) and a cumulative "over 850" total, none of it sourced to a specific CDC file. Colorado's actual registry count through 2023 is 121, and the cumulative total is 890. Every figure is now taken from CDC's case file. Logged on our corrections page.

Compared to what?

Thirty-odd U.S. cases a year against a population of 335 million is an annual incidence CDC's own surveillance summary puts at 0.04 to 0.19 cases per million (MacNeil et al., CDC, 2011). For how that risk sits beside other viruses on a common scale — and why a 35% fatality rate on a tiny case count is a different kind of risk from a 0.1% rate on millions — see the network's Virus Risk Perspective and this site's own hantavirus risk snapshot.

Notable Outbreaks & Milestones

1951–1954

Korean War Hemorrhagic Fever

Roughly 3,000 United Nations soldiers develop a mysterious hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome during the Korean War (Jonsson, Figueiredo & Vapalahti, Clin Microbiol Rev 2010). Symptoms include fever, hemorrhage, and kidney failure. The cause is unknown at the time and is later identified as Hantaan virus. The outbreak spurs decades of military-funded infectious disease research — including the U.S. Army's HFRS vaccine programme that is still running trials today (see treatment).

1976

Hantaan Virus Isolated — Ho Wang Lee

Korean virologist Ho Wang Lee isolates the causative agent from striped field mice near the Hantaan River in Korea, naming the virus (and the entire family) after the river. This discovery provides the first definitive cause for Korean hemorrhagic fever and opens the field of hantavirus research globally.

1993

Four Corners Outbreak — Sin Nombre Virus Discovered

A cluster of previously healthy young adults in the Four Corners region (New Mexico, Arizona, Colorado, Utah) die rapidly from an unknown respiratory illness. CDC investigators identify a new hantavirus — Sin Nombre ("nameless") virus — carried by the deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus). Surveillance identifies 24 compatible cases with onset since December 1992, half of them fatal (CDC's surveillance summary, MacNeil et al., Emerg Infect Dis 2011); the first published clinical series of 17 confirmed patients recorded 13 deaths, a 76% case-fatality rate (Duchin et al., N Engl J Med 1994). CDC's case file records 48 cases and 27 deaths (56%) with onset in 1993 — still the largest single year. The discovery creates the disease category of hantavirus pulmonary syndrome.

1995

Black Creek Canal Virus — Florida

A novel hantavirus, Black Creek Canal virus, is identified in Florida, carried by cotton rats. This discovery expands the geographic range of U.S. hantavirus beyond the West, establishing that multiple rodent species and virus strains co-exist across North America.

1996–1997

Andes Virus Cluster — Argentina: First Person-to-Person Transmission

A cluster of cases in El Bolsón, Argentina, provides the first molecular evidence of person-to-person transmission of any hantavirus: sequences from the linked patients were near-identical, including in people with no rodent exposure (Padula et al., Virology 1998). The strain, later named Epilink/96, is the genetic reference point against which the 2018–19 Epuyén outbreak strain was compared. Andes virus remains the only hantavirus with documented human-to-human spread (CDC, WHO).

2000s

Seoul Virus in Pet Rats — Global

Multiple outbreaks of Seoul virus — an HFRS-causing hantavirus normally carried by common rats — are identified in domestic pet rat colonies across the United States, Europe, and other regions. This is the first hantavirus associated with domestically kept animals (not wild rodents), though cases remain rare and the illness is generally milder than HPS or severe HFRS strains. Seoul virus is the only HFRS-causing hantavirus found in the United States (CDC clinician brief, May 2024).

2012

Yosemite National Park Outbreak

Ten hantavirus infections among overnight visitors from three states; eight develop HPS, five need intensive care with ventilation, and three die. Nine of the ten had stayed in "Signature Tent Cabins" — double-walled canvas structures whose foam insulation held rodent nests and tunnels. Trapping around the cabins caught a deer mouse in 51% of trap-nights and 10 of 73 deer mice (14%) carried antibodies to Sin Nombre virus (Núñez et al., Emerg Infect Dis 2014). The Park Service notified everyone who had stayed in the cabins between 10 June and 24 August 2012 (WHO Disease Outbreak News, 12 September 2012); the cabins were closed and dismantled.

2017

Seoul Virus Outbreak — U.S. Pet Rat Breeders

A Wisconsin home rat-breeder is hospitalised in December 2016 with fever, low white cells and kidney involvement; a family member falls ill four weeks later. The investigation that follows finds Seoul virus in 31 facilities in 11 states, six of which had exchanged rats with Canadian ratteries. Of 183 people tested in the two countries, 24 (13.1%) had Seoul virus antibodies; three were hospitalised and none died (Kerins et al., CDC's MMWR, February 2018). It is the first known transmission of Seoul virus from pet rats to people in the United States and Canada.

2018–2019

Epuyén, Argentina — The Largest Person-to-Person Hantavirus Outbreak on Record

From November 2018 to February 2019, Andes virus spreads through the town of Epuyén in Chubut Province: 34 confirmed infections and 11 deaths after a single introduction from a rodent. Genome sequencing and contact tracing show that three symptomatic people who attended crowded social events drove most of the spread. The median reproductive number was 2.12 before control measures and 0.96 after isolation of cases and self-quarantine of contacts were enforced once 18 cases had been confirmed. Patients with high viral loads and liver injury were the ones most likely to infect others; disease severity, age and time in hospital were not (Martínez et al., N Engl J Med 2020). WHO cited this outbreak as the precedent when assessing the 2026 cruise-ship cluster.

2025–2026

MV Hondius Cruise Ship Outbreak — First Shipboard Hantavirus Cluster

On 2 May 2026 the United Kingdom notifies WHO of severe respiratory illness aboard the Netherlands-flagged expedition ship MV Hondius, which had left Ushuaia, Argentina, on 1 April with 88 passengers and 59 crew of 23 nationalities and called at Antarctica, South Georgia, Tristan da Cunha, Saint Helena and Ascension. The first patient fell ill on 6 April and died on board on 11 April; the second, a close contact, died in Johannesburg on 26 April and was confirmed by PCR on 4 May. WHO's final tally (Disease Outbreak News, 2 July 2026): 13 cases — 12 laboratory-confirmed and one probable — and 3 deaths (case-fatality ratio 23%), all among people who had travelled on the ship; nine men and four women, median age 65; the three who died were 69, 70 and 79. One U.S. traveller's inconclusive result was later ruled negative and removed from the count on 15 May.

WHO's working conclusion is that the first case was infected on land before boarding (exposure in Chile was ruled out by the incubation window; the exact source is undetermined) and that transmission then occurred person-to-person aboard the ship — near-identical viral sequences from different patients support this. Contact follow-up in 33 countries and territories (317 high-risk contacts quarantined, 336 low-risk self-monitored, all for 42 days) found no secondary case off the ship, and WHO declared the outbreak over on 2 July 2026. Our calculation: 13 of 147 aboard is an attack rate of 8.8% — or 12 of 146 (8.2%) if the first case is treated as the imported one. WHO's own reading: "the virus did not exhibit transmission dynamics consistent with highly transmissible airborne pathogens (such as measles)." A 21-country prospective study of the exposed passengers and crew is under way; its results were not published as of September 15, 2026.

Climate & Environmental Drivers

Hantavirus case counts are not constant year to year — they track rodent population booms driven by environmental conditions. Understanding these patterns helps predict high-risk years.

El Niño Years

El Niño events (warming of Pacific Ocean temperatures) produce increased rainfall across the American Southwest, leading to more vegetation, more food for deer mice, and larger rodent populations. The hypothesis was proposed for the 1991–92 El Niño and the 1993 Four Corners outbreak, and then tested by the next strong event: after the 1997–98 El Niño, the HPS caseload in the Four Corners states rose five-fold above baseline in 1998–99, concentrated in the areas that had received the most rain — despite five years of public education (Hjelle & Glass, J Infect Dis 2000). CDC's national series is consistent with that: 1999 (43 cases) and 2000 (46) are the second- and third-highest years in the registry after 1993 (our reading of CDC's case file).

Correction, published September 15, 2026. This paragraph previously attributed the El Niño finding to "research published in the journal Science" with no citation. We could not find such a paper; the finding is from Hjelle and Glass in the Journal of Infectious Diseases, and the citation has been corrected. Logged on our corrections page.

The annual variance is a Southwest phenomenon. CDC's 1993–2009 summary found case counts in the Northwest and Midwest were relatively stable year to year (means of 5.9 and 4.9 cases a year) while the Southwest swung widely (mean 16.1, standard deviation 9.8) — the region where deer-mouse populations respond most to rainfall (MacNeil et al., Emerg Infect Dis 2011).

Seasonal Patterns

The highest-risk period is spring and early summer — when rodents emerge from winter denning, expand their territories, and enter buildings. People opening cabins, sheds, RVs, and vacation properties after winter are at the greatest risk. In CDC's case file, onset months rank May (129 cases), July (118), June (114), April (92) and August (79) at the top and January (35), December (36) and February (38) at the bottom, out of 857 cases with a known onset month — our tabulation, matching CDC's own description of a May–July peak and a December–February trough (MacNeil et al. 2011).

What Is Not Known

Three gaps are worth naming. CDC has not published a finalized annual case count for any year after 2023; everything for 2024–2026 above is provisional NNDSS data that will be revised. No agency publishes a current U.S. figure for how many deer mice carry Sin Nombre virus — the Yosemite investigation's 14% is one site in one summer. And the source of the 2026 cruise-ship index infection is still undetermined; WHO's 21-country follow-up study, which may answer it, had not reported by mid-September 2026.

Prepare for High-Risk Areas

Sources & References

Outbreak, surveillance, and case-count claims on this page are sourced to the following primary authorities:

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Reported Cases of Hantavirus Disease (page dated April 23, 2026; 890 cases 1993–2023, 859 HPS and 31 non-pulmonary; 35% died; 94% west of the Mississippi). cdc.gov/hantavirus/data-research/cases
  2. CDC. Hantavirus case-view data file (patient-level onset month, state and outcome behind the map on the page above; read September 15, 2026). gis.cdc.gov/grasp/HantaviruscaseView
  3. CDC. NNDSS Weekly Data (National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System; provisional weekly and cumulative counts by state for hantavirus pulmonary syndrome and non-pulmonary hantavirus infection; rows updated September 9, 2026). data.cdc.gov dataset x9gk-5huc
  4. CDC. About Hantavirus (reviewed May 13, 2024). cdc.gov/hantavirus/about
  5. Pan American Health Organization (PAHO). Epidemiological Alert: Hantavirus Pulmonary Syndrome in the Americas Region, 19 December 2025 (229 confirmed cases and 59 deaths in eight countries through EW 47 of 2025; country-level counts, fatality rates and comparisons to recent averages). paho.org
  6. World Health Organization (WHO). Disease Outbreak News: Hantavirus outbreak linked to cruise ship travel, Multi-locations, 2 July 2026 (final update — 13 cases, 3 deaths, 23% CFR, 33 countries and territories, outbreak containment confirmed). who.int/emergencies
  7. WHO. Disease Outbreak News: Hantavirus cluster linked to cruise ship travel, Multi-country, 4 May 2026 (first notification; ship complement, itinerary and the first two cases). 2026-DON599
  8. WHO. Disease Outbreak News: Hantavirus pulmonary syndrome — Yosemite National Park, United States of America (update), 12 September 2012. who.int/emergencies
  9. MacNeil A, Ksiazek TG, Rollin PE. Hantavirus pulmonary syndrome, United States, 1993–2009. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17(7):1195–1201. doi:10.3201/eid1707.101306 · PubMed 21762572
  10. Martínez VP, Di Paola N, Alonso DO, et al. "Super-Spreaders" and Person-to-Person Transmission of Andes Virus in Argentina. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(23):2230–2241. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2009040 · PubMed 33264545
  11. Padula PJ, Edelstein A, Miguel SD, et al. Hantavirus pulmonary syndrome outbreak in Argentina: molecular evidence for person-to-person transmission of Andes virus. Virology. 1998;241(2):323–330. doi:10.1006/viro.1997.8976 · PubMed 9499807
  12. Núñez JJ, Fritz CL, Knust B, et al. Hantavirus infections among overnight visitors to Yosemite National Park, California, USA, 2012. Emerg Infect Dis. 2014;20(3):386–393. doi:10.3201/eid2003.131581 · PubMed 24565589
  13. Kerins JL, Koske SE, Kazmierczak J, et al. Outbreak of Seoul Virus Among Rats and Rat Owners — United States and Canada, 2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018;67(4):131–134. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6704a5 · PubMed 29393924
  14. Duchin JS, Koster FT, Peters CJ, et al. Hantavirus pulmonary syndrome: a clinical description of 17 patients with a newly recognized disease. N Engl J Med. 1994;330(14):949–955. doi:10.1056/NEJM199404073301401 · PubMed 8121458
  15. Hjelle B, Glass GE. Outbreak of hantavirus infection in the Four Corners region of the United States in the wake of the 1997–1998 El Niño–southern oscillation. J Infect Dis. 2000;181(5):1569–1573. doi:10.1086/315467 · PubMed 10823755
  16. Jonsson CB, Figueiredo LTM, Vapalahti O. A Global Perspective on Hantavirus Ecology, Epidemiology, and Disease. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2010;23(2):412–441. doi:10.1128/CMR.00062-09 · PubMed 20375360